Daily Mains Question - GS 2 - 22nd June 2026
- Daksha Jain

- 4 days ago
- 2 min read
Test your UPSC CSE 2026-27 preparation with today’s GS 2 Daily Mains Question — covering the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), India’s sovereignty concerns, Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), Gwadar Port, String of Pearls strategy, maritime security, Chabahar Port, Indo-Pacific geopolitics and India’s strategic response to regional connectivity challenges.
Q. Examine the strategic implications of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) for India and discuss India’s response to safeguard its interests. (15 Marks, 250 Words)
Answer. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), launched in 2015 as the flagship project of China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), seeks to connect China's Xinjiang province with the Arabian Sea through Pakistan's Gwadar Port via a network of roads, railways, pipelines and industrial zones. Valued at over $60 billion, CPEC has significant geopolitical, economic and security implications for India, particularly in the context of sovereignty, regional connectivity and maritime security.
Strategic Implications of CPEC for India
1. Challenge to India's Sovereignty
A major portion of CPEC passes through Gilgit-Baltistan in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).
India considers the project a violation of its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
2. Strategic Expansion of China in South Asia
Strengthens the China-Pakistan strategic partnership.
Enhances China's political and economic influence in India's neighbourhood.
3. Maritime Security Concerns
Development of Gwadar Port provides China a strategic foothold near the Arabian Sea.
Located close to the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant share of India's energy imports transit.
Raises concerns regarding possible future dual-use military facilities.
4. "String of Pearls" Strategy
Gwadar complements China's network of strategic ports across the Indian Ocean:
Hambantota (Sri Lanka)
Chittagong (Bangladesh)
Sittwe (Myanmar)
Djibouti (Horn of Africa)
Potentially increases Chinese maritime presence around India.
5. Geoeconomic Implications
Enhances Pakistan's connectivity and logistics infrastructure.
May alter regional trade routes and reduce India's influence in continental connectivity initiatives.
6. Internationalisation of PoK
Invitation to third countries for participation in CPEC could indirectly legitimise Pakistan's control over disputed territories.
India's Response to Safeguard Its Interests
1. Development of Chabahar Port
Investment in Chabahar Port, Iran, located near Gwadar.
Provides direct access to Afghanistan and Central Asia while bypassing Pakistan.
2. Strategic Access to Duqm Port
Logistics and military access agreement with Oman for Duqm Port.
Enhances India's operational reach in the Western Indian Ocean.
3. Strengthening Maritime Security
Expansion of naval capabilities and maritime domain awareness.
Promotion of SAGAR (Security and Growth for All in the Region).
4. Indo-Pacific Partnerships
Active participation in:
Quad
Indo-Pacific initiatives
Maritime surveillance cooperation
Supports a free, open and inclusive Indo-Pacific.
5. Enhancing Regional Connectivity
International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC).
India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC).
Alternative connectivity frameworks to BRI.
6. Strengthening Neighbourhood Engagement
Defence and economic partnerships with Sri Lanka, Maldives, Oman and other Indian Ocean countries.
CPEC is not merely an infrastructure project but a strategic initiative with profound implications for regional geopolitics, sovereignty and maritime security. India's response has combined diplomatic opposition, alternative connectivity projects, enhanced maritime capabilities and strategic partnerships to safeguard its national interests while promoting a rules-based and secure regional order.
Value Addition (GS-II Concept): India's CPEC Concerns Framework: Sovereignty + Security + Strategic Encirclement + Connectivity Competition + Maritime Influence. |

Comments