Daily Prelims MCQs - Polity - 16th October 2025
- TPP
- Oct 16
- 5 min read
Welcome to your Daily UPSC Prelims Current Affairs MCQs – 16th October 2025. This edition is part of our subject-wise daily series, where Thursday is dedicated to Indian Polity and Governance, focusing on the intersection of constitutional provisions, legislative processes, and rights-based frameworks crucial for Prelims and Mains synergy.
Key topics in today’s set include the special constitutional provisions under Article 371, the Forest Rights Act and its implementation challenges, and the Parliamentary procedure of joint sittings under Article 108. You’ll also revisit foundational aspects such as citizenship provisions at the commencement of the Constitution and safeguards against arbitrary arrest and detention under Article 22.
Consistent practice with these MCQs will strengthen your understanding of constitutional articles, governance mechanisms, and rights-based jurisprudence, while honing analytical reasoning for the UPSC Prelims 2026’s conceptual and current-affairs–driven trend in Indian Polity.
Click Here to read the Monthly Current Affairs Pointers (CAP).
QUESTION 1
With reference to Article 371 of the Constitution of India, consider the following pairs:
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) Only three
(d) All four
Answer (a)
Explanation:
With the Ladakh groups seeking statehood for the Union Territory and insistent on its inclusion under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, sources in the central government said it was considering proposing other “constitutional safeguards” at the October 6 meeting, which could have included Article 371.
QUESTION 2
With reference to the Forest Rights Act, consider the following statements:
It was enacted in 2008.
It seeks to recognise and vest forest rights in forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers.
The law provides only for living and does not allow them to cultivate forest land.
The act allows for the collection of minor forest produce.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) Only three
(d) All four
Answer (b)
Explanation:
Nearly 15% of all forest and community land claims under the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, remain pending — with Telangana, Odisha, Assam, Gujarat and Maharashtra accounting for most cases — prompting the Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) to urge all states and Union Territories implementing the law to clear the backlog.
The highest pendency was recorded in Telangana (3.29 lakh), followed by Odisha (1.20 lakh), Assam (96,000), Gujarat (84,000) and Maharashtra (28,000) as on May 31.
Enacted in 2006, the FRA seeks to recognise and vest forest rights in forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers who have lived on such lands for generations but whose rights were never formally recorded. Hence, statement 1 is not correct and statement 2 is correct.
The law provides for both individual rights — to live in and cultivate forest land for livelihood — and community rights, including grazing, collection of minor forest produce, and protection and regeneration of forest resources. Hence, statement 3 is not correct and statement 4 is correct.
QUESTION 3
In which of the cases joint sitting of both houses is required?
If the Bill is rejected by the other House.
If more than six months elapse from the date of the reception of the Bill by the other House without the Bill being passed by it.
If the Houses disagree with the amendments to be made in the Bill.
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 2 only
(c) 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3
Answer (d)
Explanation:
Article 108 of the Constitution of India provides for joint sitting of both Houses in certain cases.
If a bill has been passed by one House and transmitted to the other House—
(a) The other House rejects the Bill; or
(b) the Houses have finally differed on the amendments to be made in the Bill;
(c) more than six months elapse from the date of the receipt of the Bill by the other House without the Bill being passed by it, the President may, unless the Bill has elapsed due to a dissolution of the House of the People, notify the Houses by message if they are sitting or by public notification if they are not sitting, of his intention to summon them to meet in a joint sitting for the purpose of deliberating and voting on the Bill.
QUESTION 4
Consider the following statements about the citizenship of India:
The provisions related to citizenship were put into effect after the Constitution of India came into effect.
The term citizenship is explicitly defined in the Constitution.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Answer (d)
Explanation:
At the start of this Constitution, every individual who has a habitation in the territory of India and —
(a) who was born in Indian territory; or
(a) either of whose parents were born in Indian territory; or
(c) who has been normally resided in Indian territory for at least five years immediately preceding such beginning.
The Indian Constitution took effect on January 26, 1950. However, it is worth mentioning that the citizenship sections went into effect only on November 29, 1949, the day the Constitution was adopted. Hence, statement 1 is not correct.
The term citizenship is not explicitly defined in the Constitution; Articles 5-11 outline the framework for citizenship at the time of the Constitution’s commencement. Hence, statement 2 is not correct.
QUESTION 5
Consider the following statements:
A person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of 24 hours of arrest.
The arrest includes the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Answer (a)
Explanation:
Article 22 of the Constitution of India provides for the protection against arrest and detention in certain cases.
No person who is arrested will be detained in custody without first being notified of the reasons for his arrest, nor may he be denied the right to speak with and be represented by a legal practitioner of his choosing.
Every person arrested and detained in custody must be brought before the nearest magistrate within twenty-four hours of arrest, excluding the time required for the journey from the place of arrest to the magistrate’s court, and no such person may be held in custody for more than twenty-four hours without the authority of a magistrate. Hence, statement 1 is correct and statement 2 is not correct.
Previous Daily UPSC Prelims MCQs Set
4th Oct 2025 - International Relations MCQs
Previous Week Current Affairs MCQs Set
Click for NCERTs Pdfs
Click for Daily Quotes:
Stay updated with the latest news by joining our Telegram channel – The PRESS Pad , and follow us on Instagram and X.
Comments