UN Declares Dec 4 as the International Day Against Unilateral Coercive Measures

In a significant move highlighting global concern over the use of economic pressure as a political tool, the United Nations General Assembly has adopted a resolution proclaiming December 4 as the International Day Against Unilateral Coercive Measures. The resolution passed with 116 votes in favour, 51 against, and 6 abstentions, revealing a deep divide between countries of the Global South and the Global North. Notably, developed countries including the United States, European Union member states, Australia, Britain, Canada, and Japan voted against the resolution.

Unilateral Coercive Measures (UCMs) refer to economic, financial, or trade sanctions imposed by one country or a group of countries without the backing of the UN Security Council. Such measures are often criticized for violating international law and the UN Charter, particularly when they affect the sovereignty and economic stability of developing nations. The resolution strongly urges all states to refrain from using such unilateral actions, emphasizing that they can hinder economic and social development, especially in vulnerable or developing economies.

The newly declared international day aims to raise global awareness about the adverse impacts of unilateral sanctions, and to foster international cooperation and solidarity in mitigating their consequences. It reflects growing global support, particularly among developing countries, for a rules-based international order that respects national sovereignty and development rights.

As part of the resolution, the UN Secretary-General has been requested to ensure that the United Nations actively commemorates and promotes this day. Additionally, UN member states, observer missions, international and regional organizations, civil society groups, and individuals are invited to observe the day each year and help amplify its message.

This resolution, while symbolic, sends a strong political signal against the use of economic coercion as a foreign policy tool. It also highlights ongoing tensions in international relations over the legitimacy and consequences of sanctions regimes, particularly when imposed unilaterally outside multilateral frameworks like the UN.